17 July 2019

Regulators Want Data on Bond-Trade Fees

Share This Story

U.S. regulators are talking a closer looks at buy and sell orders in the bond market, scrutinize trading and heighten their surveillance of brokers’ markups on retail clients’ trades. Wall Street firms are pushing back at those measures, which arrive decades after initial calls to protect individual or “retail” investors from unreasonable charges in the $13 trillion corporate, agency and municipal bond markets.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has asked for reams of bond quotations from operators of retail-oriented electronic bond-trading platforms, in some cases asking for pricing data from August to November of last year to be delivered by the third week of January. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Wall Street’s self-regulatory agency, also plans to gather price quotes from bond platforms for monitoring purposes. The agency will send a notice to industry participants this month about the proposal and will seek advice about whether to publicly disseminate the data it collects.

SEC Chairman Mary Jo White last June suggested requiring the public dissemination of buy and sell orders from bond platforms as part of the agency’s broad transparency push at a time of increased volatility and electronic trading in fixed-income markets. The focus on gathering quotations follows a November proposal Finra issued jointly with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board that would force brokers to disclose what prices they pay for bonds they flip within the same trading day to clients.

That joint proposal stops short of requiring brokers to identify their markups in the percentage terms that industry participants typically use to judge a fee’s fairness; Finra uses a 5% threshold when measuring markups and determining when to examine firms more closely. But the proposal would force brokers to disclose to clients what they and those clients have paid for the same securities, plus the differential in dollar terms.

The joint proposal applies to orders of $100,000 or less, and is available for public comment through Jan. 20. The SEC would have to approve any rules before they take effect, which could take several months.

Representatives at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Bond Dealers of America, which represent securities dealers, said the new disclosures might be misleading, as they could be too technical for unsophisticated investors to understand, and may not take into account how different transaction costs may relate to the movement in prices throughout the trading day.

Currently, most investors only see prices after trades are complete, either through Finra’s Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine known as “Trace” for corporate debt or the MSRB’s Electronic Municipal Market Access websitecalled “Emma” for municipal bonds.

Bonds typically trade infrequently, unlike the stock market, in which exchanges continuously publish prices, and many bond investors complain they don’t know what constitutes a fair price at the time of trading. Retail investors often say they don’t use or understand the price-comparison tools in the market. Studies suggest they are at the most risk of excessive markups.

Fees have been dropping, yet remain above those charged in other, more transparent markets, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, part of McGraw Hill Financial. Individual investors buying highly rated municipal bonds now pay on average 1.31% in fees per transaction, down from about 2% in 2011, the data company found.

Click here to access the full article on The Wall Street Journal. 



Join Our Online Community
Join the Better Way To Retire community and get access to applications, relevant research, groups and blogs. Let us help you Retire Better™
FamilyWealth Social News
Follow Us