26 June 2017

Target Date 2.0

#
Share This Story

"Target-date funds are a positive for sponsors and participants,” says Jed Petty, CFA and Director of DC Strategies at Wellington Management. “They have come in for criticism recently, but I would argue they are a big improvement over what participants had previously. Often it was 100% stable value, or 100% company stock, or balances spread out across 10 options at 10% each, which is a questionable approach to asset allocation. Compared to where we were before target-date funds, I think they have been a big success.”

According to the Investment Company Institute (ICI), at the end of 2011 target-date funds were offered by 70% of 401(k) plans. But those statistics belie a much bigger shift taking place with respect to age groups. As more plans add target-date funds as their default option—and opt newer employees into those funds—younger participants end up using these vehicles at a higher rate than other participants: the Employee Benefits Research Institute reports that 52% of participants in their 20s invest in target-date funds versus 45% for those in their 40s; and the ICI reports that target-date funds now hold 27% of retirement assets for participants in their 20s— compared to just 9% for participants in their 60s."

“I believe target-date funds are a great solution for many, many participants,” says Wellington’s Petty. “I think what will happen, and what we hope happens over time, is that the construction of target-date funds continues to improve. They are an ideal way to implement more sophisticated investment strategies in a very simple investment vehicle—essentially a great way to implement DB type sophistication in a 401(k) plan for 401(k) plan participants.”

To read more of this article click here.  

Join Our Online Community
Join the Better Way To Retire community and get access to applications, relevant research, groups and blogs. Let us help you Retire Better™
FamilyWealth Social News
Follow Us