27 June 2026

40-Hour Worker Means More to Small Businesses

#
Share This Story

Some small-business owners are hopeful that a new Congress will change the federal health law’s requirement that businesses provide health insurance to workers who clock as little as 30 hours a week, or pay a penalty. Republicans taking over control of the Senate would like to extend the law’s definition of a full-time workweek to 40 hours or more. That move, which would require President Barack Obama ’s approval, could benefit companies with 300 employees.

Starting next year, companies with at least 100 full-time workers, are required to offer health coverage—or face fines, ranging from $2,000 to $3,000 per employee. Those with at least 50 full-time workers must provide coverage to their full-timers by 2016, or risk facing the penalties.

About 40% of American Leisure’s employees work between 30 and 40 hours a week, while just over half work more than 40 hours. With the law’s current definition of a full-time workweek at 30 hours, he is likely to reduce the weekly hours for many of his employees.

Most Americans work 40 or more hours weekly. Of the roughly 144 million people with jobs in the U.S. in October, about 46.6 million, or 32%, worked between one and 39 hours a week, while 97.2 million worked 40 hours or more, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Indeed, that agency defines part-time as less than 35 hours weekly.

The GOP-controlled House of Representatives, in an April vote, backed raising what qualifies as a full-time workweek under the health law to 40 hours a week, from 30, though Mr. Obama at the time threatened to veto the change. In the wake of last week’s election, House Speaker John Boehner said that the 40-hour definition remained one of his top agenda items for the new Congress.

Mr. Kass’s firm, which operates fitness clubs, pools and spas in residential buildings and hotels, currently offers an employer-sponsored plan to all its full-time workers, covering 20% to over 50% of their monthly insurance costs. Less than half have signed on to the plan. He worries that at least some of his employees, especially those earning $15 an hour, may be eligible to receive subsidies for individual plans they purchase from the state health-insurance exchanges, if the company’s health plan costs more than 9.5% of their income.

For every full-time employee who receives such subsidies, the company may face a $3,000 fine, for instance. Consequently, extending the definition of the full-time to 40 hours will put his business “in much better shape” next year, he says. If fewer of his employees were considered full timers, the penalties his business would face would then be significantly less.

The law exempts businesses of all sizes from having to offer coverage to part-timers working less than 30 hours weekly. It also doesn’t require businesses with fewer than 50 full-time workers to offer employee health coverage to employees.

Critics of a 30-hour workweek threshold for full timers say they worry that smaller employers—but who still employ at least 50 full-time workers—may seek to cut back their workers’ hours, in an attempt to avoid the health law’s requirements altogether.

To be sure, there is scant evidence so far that employers are cutting workers’ hours in response to the health law, though part-time employment rates remain high in the wake of the recession, says Elise Gould, a senior economist with the Economic Policy Institute. In fact, some economists argue that raising the full-time worker measure to 40 hours a week will have an even bigger impact on workers’ hours.

The proposal to raise the full-time workweek definition to 40 hours for the purposes of the health law would likely require support from at least 60 votes in the Senate. Republicans have locked in 53 seats for the new year.

The measure has already garnered support from two Senate Democrats, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Joe Donnelly of Indiana. Supporters of the move are also eyeing Virginia Democratic Sen. Mark Warner and whoever wins Louisiana’s Dec. 6 runoff. Employer trade associations say they will launch new campaigns in states where they think they can pick up additional Democrats.

Click here to access the full article on The Wall Street Journal. 

Join Our Online Community
Join the Better Way To Retire community and get access to applications, relevant research, groups and blogs. Let us help you Retire Better™
FamilyWealth Social News
Follow Us