19 April 2024

Advisers Can Avoid Costly ETF-Trading Missteps

#
Share This Story

Exchange-traded funds continue to gain in popularity among financial advisers, but some fall into trading traps that can add unnecessary expense for their clients. These mistakes can chip away at what is one of the main appeals of ETFs-–their low cost structure. Some types of slip-ups would seem obvious, such as forgetting to use a limit order to ensure the price that is paid for shares isn’t too high or the sale price too low. Others are less apparent, and may become clear only after doing some homework. Financial advisers were among the early adopters of ETFs, which can be bought and sold on an exchange at prices that change throughout the market day, unlike mutual funds, which set their prices only at the end of each trading day.

There seem to be three camps of advisers using ETFs. In the first are those who use them to trade relatively often, typically on technical signals. The second group includes those who typically invest in stocks, but park cash in ETFs temporarily when they don’t see a clear market trend. The third is made up of those who use ETFs as a long-term investment tool. It is noticeable to see advisers in every group making missteps.

Most financial advisers--including registered investment advisers, independent advisers and brokers--regardless of their size, aren’t trading ETFs for the short term. It is important for them to know their current underlying value, average daily trading volume, liquidity and, most importantly, the bid-ask spread--that is, the difference between the highest price a buyer is willing to pay and the lowest price a seller is willing to accept.

Bid-ask spreads for most ETFs are very tight, indicating that the funds are accurately tracking the value of their holdings. With some new, small or thinly traded ETFs that spread can widen, however.  It is recommended that an adviser confirm the bid-ask spread with his broker’s trading desk before placing an order--and then make sure in most instances that it is a limit order, not a market order. The latter means paying the best available price, even if there’s an unexpected swing in price.

An adviser may not expect his own order to move an ETF’s price, but even small orders may do so if a fund is thinly traded. But while that may work when buying or selling large-cap stocks, with ETFs, liquidity may be constrained in the hands of market makers (broker-dealers who seek to provide continuous liquidity to the market) or other authorized participants, who help to create and redeem ETF units.

On the other hand, even in cases of thinly traded funds there may be the possibility for an adviser to make a relatively large order, particularly if the underlying assets are fairly liquid. To determine if such an order can be effected, the adviser should first talk to a market maker or other participant.

Ian Schaad, managing director of ETF sales and trading at Jane Street, says the bigger the percentage of an ETF’s average daily trading volume an investor plans to trade, the more care he should take to obtain all the appropriate information. He and others also advise that investors trade only when the market for the underlying securities that an ETF tracks is open, and avoid trading right at that market’s open or close.

Click here to access the full article on The Wall Street Journal. 

Join Our Online Community
Join the Better Way To Retire community and get access to applications, relevant research, groups and blogs. Let us help you Retire Better™
FamilyWealth Social News
Follow Us