29 September 2020

Do 401k Menus Suffer from a Generation Gap

Share This Story
Traditionally, fixed-income investments have been used to reduce a portfolio’s overall volatility to an acceptable level without significantly reducing returns—but that objective may require reconsideration amidst today’s diverse, multi-generational workforce.  

A new whitepaper, authored by the research team at the American Retirement Association, and sponsored by Janus Henderson Investors, points out that in the past, investment recommendations may have been more focused on achieving minimum compliance and “checking the fixed income box” rather than anticipating participant investment needs at various life stages.

A multi-generational participant population has more complex needs.

“A participant’s investment needs will vary during the accumulation stage, as a ‘term vested’ participant, and during periods of decumulation as a ‘retiree’,” Jack Towarnicky, researcher at the American Retirement Association and co-author of the report, said in a statement. “Needs may also change when a surviving spouse steps into the participant’s shoes and continues participation.  Many plans also permit a non-spouse beneficiary to continue the account for a specified period.”

The whitepaper, drawing on the findings of a survey conducted jointly by the Plan Sponsor Council of America (PSCA) and the National Association of Plan Advisors (NAPA), points out that while the vast majority of financial professional respondents said that they considered diversification in their recommendations, fewer than two-thirds of investment professionals (63.4%) confirmed that “correlation with equities” was an “essential” or a “preferred” criterion in recommending fixed income options.

Key considerations

Critically, particularly in view of the diversity of participant investment practices, as well as participants’ diverse needs and uses of plan assets, fewer than 25% of investment professionals consider key participant demographical aspects such as tenure, salary, education level, presence of other benefits (such as a defined benefit pension plan), gender, account balance, and/or ethnicity/race.

“Today, an ever-increasing number of plan sponsors encourage participants to retain assets in the plan after separation,” Nevin Adams, chief content officer of the American Retirement Association, added.  “Additionally, provisions in the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement (SECURE) Act, such as an extension in the required minimum distribution age, and expansions of the safe harbors for lifetime income options may well mean that fiduciaries will—and should—be more attentive to broader consideration of fixed income alternatives in the future.”

“Fiduciaries have long understood the need for a diversified menu of investment options.  However, regardless of plan size, plan provisions, or diverse participant populations, the typical 401k plan has three to four times as many equity options as fixed-income choices,” Towarnicky concluded.  “As the prevalence and amount of guaranteed retirement income from other sources declines (e.g., defined benefit pension plans), and as more participants age into retirement, a more diverse set of fixed income options may be needed for income generation.”

Click here for the original article.

Join Our Online Community
Join the Better Way To Retire community and get access to applications, relevant research, groups and blogs. Let us help you Retire Better™
FamilyWealth Social News
Follow Us