22 April 2019

The New Rules of Estate Planning

Share This Story

The federal estate tax is no longer the biggest concern for most affluent people who want to avoid taxes on wealth they leave to heirs. In 2004, the estates of people who died owning assets worth more than $1.5 million were subject to federal tax at top rates approaching 50%, and married couples had to set up trusts to benefit from their full $3 million estate exemption.

Finally, last year, Congress set the top estate-and-gift-tax rate at 40% and raised the exemption to $5 million per person, adjusted for inflation. It now stands at $5.34 million and is expected to rise to $5.43 million next year. Lawmakers also changed the rules so that couples don’t need trusts to get their full break from Uncle Sam.

These changes have freed hundreds of thousands of affluent Americans from worrying about federal estate tax, and they may never have to.

The new rules present tax-saving opportunities that many people planning estates remain unaware of—and that could contradict past advice. Many people who won’t owe estate tax can reap substantial tax savings on capital gains by choosing carefully which assets to hold until death. This strategy is especially useful now that the top federal rate on long-term gains is nearly 24%, two-thirds higher than in 2012.

The upshot: People covered by the federal estate-tax exemption should review the plans they have in place to look for more tax savings. Here are important factors to consider.

Reset Capital Gains 

The federal code has long had a provision, known as the “step-up,” that cancels the long-term capital-gains tax on assets that a taxpayer holds until death. The step-up automatically raises the owner’s cost basis for such assets—the starting point for measuring a taxable gain—to its full market value as of the date of death.

If the investor holds the same asset until death, however, the capital-gains tax vanishes. The asset will be included in the owner’s estate at full market value, where the exemption of more than $5 million per person could shelter it from federal estate tax as well.

Experts recommend scrutinizing which assets to hold until death to maximize the step-up. This move is especially important in high-tax states such as California, where the top combined federal and state capital-gains rate exceeds 35%.

Tap the Right Assets 

To meet cash needs, some advisers say, it may even make sense to take out a loan rather than selling appreciated investments in taxable accounts, especially with interest rates low.

Another strategy: making withdrawals from traditional individual retirement accounts or other retirement plans. Because such assets are in tax-deferred accounts, they don’t get a step-up in basis. Many planners are advising couples to review their assets with the step-up in mind.

Rethink Your Trusts 

The growing prominence of the step-up also affects tax-saving trusts. Until the advent of a provision known as “portability” in 2011, spouses often needed trusts to provide their estates with the full value of two federal estate-tax exemptions.

Now, however, a surviving spouse can claim the unused portion of a partner’s exemption. Experts say many couples still have tax-saving trusts set up years ago that could actually raise taxes for heirs.

People with more sophisticated tax-saving strategies, such as a grantor-retained annuity trust, or GRAT, also should re-examine them with the step-up in mind. GRATs are used to transfer the appreciation in an asset that is expected to surge in value—but the asset often has a low cost-basis.

Some advisers are also turning to a long-dormant arrangement often called an “estate trust.” It uses complex moves to provide a double step-up on a highly appreciated asset to a married couple after the first spouse dies. In effect, this trust aims to give couples who don’t live in community-property states the same advantage as those who do.

Reconsider Gifting 

Advisers are urging clients to take a hard look at the gifts they make to other people as part of their estate planning.

When a person gives a noncash asset to someone else, the original owner’s cost basis carries over to the recipient. So if an aunt gives her nephew stock shares worth $10,000 that she acquired for $500 many years ago, then the nephew’s cost basis will be $500 when he sells the stock. By contrast, if the aunt leaves the shares to the nephew at her death and they are worth $10,000, that becomes his cost basis—and there isn’t tax on the gain between $500 and $10,000.

Beware of State Taxes 

Nineteen states and the District of Columbia—home to about one-third of the U.S. population—levy an estate tax on the assets of people who die or an inheritance tax on those receiving the assets, or both.

There also are quirks in some state levies. New York, for example, will soon have an exemption of more than $3 million per person—but people whose assets are greater than 105% of the break get no exemption at all. This provision is often called “the cliff.” For taxpayers living in states with death taxes, the good news is that there is a trend toward larger exemptions.

Click here to access the full article on The Wall Street Journal. 

Join Our Online Community
Join the Better Way To Retire community and get access to applications, relevant research, groups and blogs. Let us help you Retire Better™
FamilyWealth Social News
Follow Us