21 January 2019

Beyond the Traditional Estate Planning 'Choices'

Share This Story

Estate planners often advise clients that there are only three places where you can leave your assets at death:  family, taxes and charity.   It became popular to focus on this rule of thumb to encourage tax and charitable planning in the past when estate tax exemptions were lower and marginal rates higher.  Today, however, client couples can pass more than $10 million free of estate tax, and so for many clients, estate taxes are no longer the estate planning drivers that they once were.  This change is welcome relief for many clients, and even while income tax planning has become more important, it presents a chance to shift focus.  Estate planners must become more creative as more of their clients have assets below the exemption amount.  This shift presents a good opportunity to re-visit potential estate recipients and specifically determine if there are other potential  “places” beyond the traditional three. 


As they say, “blood is thicker than water,” and in most cases, family will still be the primary intended recipient of most client’s estate plans.  Indeed, the presumption that family comes first is codified in most legal systems around the world.  Outside the United States and other common law jurisdictions, individuals generally have very little choice other than to leave their estate to their family.  Within the United States, the laws of intestacy and community property regimes provide that family members are the legal heirs but allow individuals to opt out of this default.  In fact, laws in the United States provide the greatest leeway to proactively choose one’s heirs.  It’s possible to expand beyond family, even though that’s not often done.   In combination with higher estate tax exemptions, the legal system supports additional options for clients who’ve wanted to leave assets to non-family members but might have been reluctant to do so or, in many cases, advised against it for tax reasons by their advisors.   lead to surprising, but meaningful, changes in clients’ estate plans. 


For several decades, there’s been a movement to integrate charitable considerations into estate planning discussions.  Not only does it provide an opportunity for a client to continue supporting organizations that have played an important part in the client’s life, but also, it’s an opening into a discussion of meaning and purpose that defines legacy more broadly.  By expanding the conversation around charity, an advisor can help craft a more tailored and purposeful estate plan for a client.  In addition, it might prompt clients who don’t have family or others who they wish to include in a will to think more deeply about the charitable aspects of their plan.   


While most advisors assume that clients wish to avoid taxes at all costs, this might not always be the case.  Some clients are willing to forego tax savings if they can accomplish more important goals.   Retention of assets within a family might be one reason.  In many other cases, a client might choose to stay in, or move to, a higher tax jurisdiction to be near loved ones.  Advisors who push a client to move, or support a client’s move to another state or country solely for tax reasons, might be doing a disservice.  Probing with  “What else?” might expose the human impact of tax driven planning.

Click here to access the full article on WealthManagement.com

Join Our Online Community
Join the Better Way To Retire community and get access to applications, relevant research, groups and blogs. Let us help you Retire Better™
FamilyWealth Social News
Follow Us